Below is information about WHY EPA HEADQUARTERS UNION OF SCIENTISTS OPPOSE FLUORIDATION from a variety of sources. Please take a look at the materials that our team has selected for you.
https://www.conspiracies.net/water-fluoridation-conspiracy-america-rotting-fluoride-killer/#:~:text=In%201999%20the%20EPA%20headquarters%20of%20the%20Union,the%20hazards%20to%20human%20health%20from%20such%20ingestion.
https://fluoridealert.org/articles/epa-union/
The following documents why our union, formerly National Federation of Federal Employees Local 2050 and since April 1998 Chapter 280 of the National Treasury Employees Union, took the stand it did opposing fluoridation of drinking water supplies. Our union is comprised of and represents the approximately 1500 scientists, lawyers, engineers and other professional employees at …
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Why+EPA%27S+headquarters+professionals%27+union+oppose+fluoridation%3a+Dr....-a093306313
It was OK, EPA said, because it considered that condition to be only a cosmetic effect, not ma adverse health effect, We found that the reason for EPA's position was that it was under political pressure to set its health-based standard for fluoride at 4 mg/liter (2).
http://www.fluoridation.com/epa2.htm
EPA scientists take action against EPA for failing to protect public health-- Important scientific and technical considerations were ignored when the Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level (RMCL) for fluoride was set (1986 Amicus Brief). The need for a Code of Ethics at the EPA became critical. Without an enforceable code of ethics with …
https://fluoridealert.org/content/hirzy_portland/
Dr. William Hirzy, former VP of EPA’s HQ Union, Recommends Portland Flush Fluoridation Proposal. Dr. William Hirzy, a former risk assessment scientist at the Environmental Protection Agency, explains why EPA Headquarters Union of Scientists and Professionals oppose fluoridation. This letter, written in March 2013, was sent to Clean Water Portland — a group that …
https://fluoridefreesudbury.wordpress.com/2017/12/19/epas-dr-bill-hirzy-exposes-the-fluoridation-program/
I am not here as a representative of EPA, but rather as a representative of EPA headquarters professional employees, through their duly elected labor union. The union first got involved in this issue in 1985 as a matter of professional ethics. In 1997 we most recently voted to oppose fluoridation. Our opposition has strengthened since then.
http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v08n30.shtml
Dr. William Hirzy & the EPA Union on Fluoridation On June 29th, 2000, Dr. William Hirzy was invited to give testimony before a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate. At the time, Dr. Hirzy was serving his sixth term as the Senior Vice-President of EPA's Headquarters Union of Scientists and Professionals. His presentation that day was, "Why EPA's ...
https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Facts_about_Fluoridation.htm
In light of the recent research indicating health risks from low level fluoride exposure, the Union of Scientists and Professionals at EPA Headquarters has voted to oppose fluoridation 37 and has called upon Congress to issue a "national moratorium" on the fifty year old policy. According to the Vice President of the Union, Dr. J. William Hirzy,
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/political-mischaracterization-of-fluoridation-opposition-dismays-scientists-96917849.html
According to Connett and other scientists, "Fluoridation is reckless as there is clear science indicating that fluoride has the potential to damage human bones, kidneys, thyroid and …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy
U.S. opponents of fluoridation were heartened by a 2006 National Research Council report about hazards of water naturally fluoridated to high levels; the report recommended lowering the U.S. maximum limit of 4 mg/L for fluoride in drinking water. The EPA did not act on that recommendation. Court cases Europe
https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Water_fluoridation_controversy
Opponents counter that there is no U.S. RDA (recommended dietary allowance) for fluoride and claim industrial fluorosilicates are serious neurotoxic and mutagenic health hazards, even at the 1 part per million level deemed "optimal" by pro-fluoridation groups. The EPA Headquarters Union of Scientists say recent, peer-reviewed studies that document bone fractures, pediatric …
Did you find the information you need about WHY EPA HEADQUARTERS UNION OF SCIENTISTS OPPOSE FLUORIDATION?
We hope you found all the information about WHY EPA HEADQUARTERS UNION OF SCIENTISTS OPPOSE FLUORIDATION you were looking for and more.
